Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā  Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā  Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā  Skip to main content
Logo
  • Home
  • Who We Are
    • Results
    • Alan Kolodny
    • Rashon Murrill
    • Testimonials
  • Practice Areas
    • Auto Accidents
    • Trucking Accidents
      • Tanker Truck Accidents
      • Tow Truck Accidents
      • Underride Truck Accidents
    • Slip & Fall Accidents
    • Railroad Accidents
    • Maritime Accidents
      • Boat Accidents
      • Dive Boat Accidents
    • Delivery Accidents
  • Service Areas
    • Angleton, TX
    • Brazoria, TX
    • Houston, TX
    • Katy, TX
    • Lake Jackson, TX
    • League City, TX
      • Car Accident
    • Pearland, TX
      • Car Accidents
    • Pasadena, TX
      • Car Accidents
    • Sugar Land, TX
      • Car Accidents
    • The Woodlands, TX
      • Car Accidents
  • Articles
  • Contact Us
(713) 532-4474 Call Now

Ship Owner as a Passenger

Home > Ship Owner as a Passenger
Attorney Portrait
Aug 13, 2018 | By Alan Kolodny | Read Time: 2 minutes | Maritime Law

In the event of a maritime accident in which one party sues another party for negligence in relation to the accident, the Federal District Court hearing the case is tasked with determining what obligations the defendant had when the accident occurred. If the defendant owed a specific duty of care to the plaintiff, the defendant is liable for damages resulting from the accident; if not, the defendant is not obligated.

A recent case discussed a question in respect of obligations of the owner of a boat. As a general rule, the United States Supreme Court stated in the case of Kermarec v. Compagnie Generale Transatlantique from 1959 : ā€œWe hold that the owner of a ship in navigable waters owes to all who are on board for purposes not inimical to his legitimate interests the duty of exercising reasonable care under the circumstances of each case.ā€

At the same time, the Eleventh Circuit in the case Weissman v. Boating Magazine from 1991 stated that a passenger has no obligation to be a lookout for the captain or driver of the boat. In its simplest form, this means that someone who is riding in the boat is not negligent if he or she does not alert the captain to a possible harm.

Holzhauer

In the recent case of Holzhauer v. Golden Gate Bridge Highway & Transportation, Harry Holzhauer was steering a ship owned by his friend David Rhoades in the Bay by San Francisco. Rhoades did not inform Holzhauer about a possible collision with a ferry. The boat and the ferry collided, which killed Holzhauer. Mary Holzhauer, the wife of the late David Holzhauer, sued Rhoades for negligence, claiming that he should have warned Harry Holzhauer about the possible collision.

Rhoades, the defendant, countered that he is not responsible for what happened to Holzhauer because, based on the Weissman case, a passenger has no duty to be a lookout for a captain of the ship. Because he had no such duty of care, Rhoades claimed, he was not legally negligent for the collision and therefore bears no financial responsibility for the tragic accident.

Mary Holzhauer cited the Kermac case that an owner of a ship is responsible to the passengers of the ship. She claimed that this applies to being a lookout as well.

The District Court and the Ninth Circuit considered this case and tried to determine the balance with respect to a ship owner who is a passenger on a boat between the Weissman case that holds that a passenger has no duty to be a lookout for a ship whereas the Kermac case states that an owner has a duty of care to all those on the boat.

Ruling

The Court ruled in favor of Rhoades, reasoning that when an owner who is also a passenger acts as a passenger then he has no duty to be a lookout. Rhoades, as an owner, had a duty to entrust the boat in the hands of someone competent and there is nothing suggesting otherwise when he let Holzhauer steer the ship. As a passenger, however, he had no duty to be a lookout.

Involved in a maritime accident? Contact the Kolodny law firm, a maritime accident firm.

Author Photo
Alan Kolodny

Alan Kolodny is committed to representing injured clients in Texas and throughout the United States. Alan earned his B.A. fromĀ Rice UniversityĀ and his J.D. fromĀ Southern Methodist University.

He focuses his practice on representing plaintiffs in personal injury cases involving the following matters: maritime and offshore accidents, including those under the Jones Act; automobile and 18-wheeler truck accidents; and industrial site accidents, work-related accidents, and claims for injured railroad workers under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act.

Rate this Post
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars
Loading...
  • Share

    • Contact Us
    • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Questions about Your Case?
713-532-4474
Mon. - Fri.: 9:00am - 6:00pm
akolodny@fko-law.com
  • 1011 Augusta Dr., Ste 111 Houston, TX 77057
  • Contact us now!
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

No win, no fee

GET IT TOUCH
  • © 2025 Kolodny Law Firm.
  •  | All Rights Reserved.
  •  | Disclaimer
  •  | Sitemap
Site By:

The content on this website is offered as a public service by Kolodny Law Firm and is meant for informational purposes only.

The content on this website does not provide legal advice for any specific situation nor does it create an attorney-client relationship between any reader and any attorney at Kolodny Law Firm.

  • Contact Us for a Consultation Schedule your free consultation.
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Client movie

713-532-4474
  • EspaƱol