Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā  Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā  Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā  Skip to main content
Logo
  • Home
  • Who We Are
    • Results
    • Alan Kolodny
    • Rashon Murrill
  • Practice Areas
    • Auto Accidents
    • Trucking Accidents
      • Tanker Truck Accidents
      • Tow Truck Accidents
      • Underride Truck Accidents
    • Slip & Fall Accidents
    • Railroad Accidents
    • Maritime Accidents
      • Boat Accidents
      • Dive Boat Accidents
    • Delivery Accidents
  • Service Areas
    • Angleton, TX
    • Brazoria, TX
    • Houston, TX
    • Katy, TX
    • Lake Jackson, TX
    • League City, TX
      • Car Accident
    • Pearland, TX
      • Car Accidents
    • Pasadena, TX
      • Car Accidents
    • Sugar Land, TX
      • Car Accidents
    • The Woodlands, TX
      • Car Accidents
  • Articles
  • Contact Us
(713) 532-4474 Call Now

What is the Savings to Suitors Clause?

Home > What is the Savings to Suitors Clause?
Attorney Portrait
Sep 6, 2024 | By Alan Kolodny | Read Time: 2 minutes | Maritime Law
Jump to Topic hide
1 Understanding the Savings to Suitors Clause in Maritime Law
2 What is the Savings to Suitors Clause?
3 Implications of the Savings to Suitors Clause
4 The Concept of Reverse Erie
5 Conclusion
6 Contact Us 24/7 for a Free Consultation

Understanding the Savings to Suitors Clause in Maritime Law

Maritime law typically falls under federal jurisdiction, meaning that cases involving maritime issues are generally adjudicated in federal court, applying federal law. However, an important exception exists: theĀ savings to suitorsĀ clause, which allows certain cases to be heard in state courts.

What is the Savings to Suitors Clause?

TheĀ savings to suitorsĀ clause is codified inĀ 28 USC § 1333, which states: ā€œAny civil case of admiralty or maritime jurisdiction, saving to suitors in all cases all other remedies to which they are otherwise entitled.ā€ This provision essentially grants plaintiffs the option to pursue maritime claims in state court, even when these claims may have both federal and state elements.

Implications of the Savings to Suitors Clause

When a plaintiff files a maritime or admiralty suit in state court that includes both federal and state law claims stemming from the same incident, the case cannot be removed to federal court. This is significant for claimants who may prefer the procedural or strategic advantages of state court.

For example, a case involving an injury that occurred at sea could be classified as a common law tort in state court rather than strictly as an admiralty case. The savings to suitors clause permits this approach, ensuring that the plaintiff can maintain their case within the state judicial system.

The Concept of Reverse Erie

The cases that invoke the savings to suitors clause are often referred to asĀ reverse ErieĀ cases. TheĀ Erie DoctrineĀ dictates that federal courts exercising diversity jurisdiction must apply state law when resolving state-law claims. In other words, if a plaintiff from Texas sues a defendant from Oklahoma in federal court for over $75,000, the federal court would apply Texas law to the case.

In contrast, when a state court hears a maritime case under the savings to suitors clause, it applies federal maritime law, even though the case may be framed as a common law tort. State courts can also apply state law, but only in circumstances where it does not conflict with established federal maritime and admiralty law. This unique interplay ensures that maritime law remains consistent across different jurisdictions while respecting the preferences of plaintiffs.

Conclusion

The savings to suitors clause plays a vital role in maritime law by providing plaintiffs with the flexibility to choose their forum. Understanding how this clause operates, particularly in relation to the reverse Erie doctrine, can significantly impact the strategy for pursuing maritime claims.

Contact Us 24/7 for a Free Consultation

If you have been injured in a maritime accident, it’s crucial to understand your rights and options.Ā Contact Kolodny Law FirmĀ for dedicated legal guidance tailored to your situation.

Author Photo
Alan Kolodny

Alan Kolodny is committed to representing injured clients in Texas and throughout the United States. Alan earned his B.A. fromĀ Rice UniversityĀ and his J.D. fromĀ Southern Methodist University.

He focuses his practice on representing plaintiffs in personal injury cases involving the following matters: maritime and offshore accidents, including those under the Jones Act; automobile and 18-wheeler truck accidents; and industrial site accidents, work-related accidents, and claims for injured railroad workers under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act.

Rate this Post
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars
Loading...
  • Share

    • Contact Us
    • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Questions about Your Case?
713-532-4474
Mon. - Fri.: 9:00am - 6:00pm
akolodny@fko-law.com
  • 1011 Augusta Dr., Ste 111 Houston, TX 77057
  • Contact us now!
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

No win, no fee

GET IT TOUCH
  • © 2025 Kolodny Law Firm.
  •  | All Rights Reserved.
  •  | Disclaimer
  •  | Sitemap
Site By:

The content on this website is offered as a public service by Kolodny Law Firm and is meant for informational purposes only.

The content on this website does not provide legal advice for any specific situation nor does it create an attorney-client relationship between any reader and any attorney at Kolodny Law Firm.

  • Contact Us for a Consultation Schedule your free consultation.
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Client movie

713-532-4474
  • EspaƱol