Skip to main content
Logo
  • Home
  • Who We Are
    • Results
    • Alan Kolodny
    • Rashon Murrill
  • Practice Areas
    • Auto Accidents
    • Trucking Accidents
      • Tanker Truck Accidents
      • Tow Truck Accidents
      • Underride Truck Accidents
    • Slip & Fall Accidents
    • Railroad Accidents
    • Maritime Accidents
      • Boat Accidents
      • Dive Boat Accidents
    • Delivery Accidents
  • Service Areas
    • Angleton, TX
    • Brazoria, TX
    • Houston, TX
    • Katy, TX
    • Lake Jackson, TX
    • League City, TX
      • Car Accident
    • Pearland, TX
      • Car Accidents
    • Pasadena, TX
      • Car Accidents
    • Sugar Land, TX
      • Car Accidents
    • The Woodlands, TX
      • Car Accidents
  • Articles
  • Contact Us
(713) 532-4474 Call Now

Cruise Negligence

Home > Cruise Negligence
Attorney Portrait
Jun 15, 2018 | By Alan Kolodny | Read Time: 2 minutes | Maritime Law

 In simple terms, a cruise line takes responsibility for all thepassengers on the ship. The cruise line provides meals, room, board, and all other regular services. A cruise line is basically a hotel on the water. While out at sea, there is nothing around other than the ship. Most often, there is almost nothing within the ship’s vicinity. This emphasizes the ship operator’s obligation to the passengers onboard the cruise.

In a recent case, however, questions arose as to the extent of the responsibility that falls upon the ship operator.

L.A. v. Royal Caribbean Cruise Lines

In the current case of
L.A. v. Royal Caribbean Cruise Lines, L.A., a minor plaintiff, claimed that while he was aboard a Royal Caribbean Cruise in 2017 he was sexually assaulted by two adults. Specifically, he claims that the two adult men were drunk early one morning and they came over to him, brought him to a room, and violated him.

The plaintiff claims that Royal Caribbean had a duty to maintain a safe environment, including monitoring drunk patrons, and that the cruise line breached that duty.

Elements of a Maritime Negligence Claim

Based on the 2012 11th Circuit case of Chapparo v. Carnival Cruise Lines, to succeed on a maritime negligence case, a plaintiff must demonstrate the following elements:

  • Defendant had a duty to protect Plaintiff from a particular injury;
  • Defendant breached that duty;
  • The breach actually and proximately caused Plaintiff’s injury; and
  • Plaintiff suffered actual harm.

Duty to Protect

In determining what Royal Caribbean’s duty was vis a vis the plaintiff, the plaintiff claims that Royal Caribbean had a duty to install surveillance cameras in common areas and to monitor those cameras for the security of the passengers. The issue is whether the plaintiff reasonably relied on surveillance cameras and therefore can allege a duty. The court noted that it is a question that cannot be dismissed based on a motion to dismiss.

In addition,
Royal Caribbean has been a defendant in numerous lawsuits regarding safety aboard one of its many vessels. As such, courts reasoned, Royal Caribbean is aware that there are various dangers to passengers aboard one of its ships. As such, Royal Caribbean had sufficient warning and notice that it must maintain safety, provided that it is reasonable, at all times.

Causation

In tort law, an important aspect is causation, which, in these terms, means that it was foreseeable. It is required, for purposes of negligence, that the harm was foreseeable. It can be argued that if adults are visibly intoxicated upon a ship, then they are prone to violent acts. Consequently, it can be argued that a ship is responsible for the acts committed by one passenger to another, so there may very well be causation in this case.

This case is still in the courts and it will be interesting to see how the court judges these cases.

Have you been hurt aboard a ship? Contact a law firm that understands and is involved in the maritime sector. Contact the Kolodny law firm.

Author Photo
Alan Kolodny

Alan Kolodny is committed to representing injured clients in Texas and throughout the United States. Alan earned his B.A. from Rice University and his J.D. from Southern Methodist University.

He focuses his practice on representing plaintiffs in personal injury cases involving the following matters: maritime and offshore accidents, including those under the Jones Act; automobile and 18-wheeler truck accidents; and industrial site accidents, work-related accidents, and claims for injured railroad workers under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act.

Rate this Post
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars
Loading...
  • Share

    • Contact Us
    • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Questions about Your Case?
713-532-4474
Mon. - Fri.: 9:00am - 6:00pm
akolodny@fko-law.com
  • 1011 Augusta Dr., Ste 111 Houston, TX 77057
  • Contact us now!
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

No win, no fee

GET IT TOUCH
  • © 2025 Kolodny Law Firm.
  •  | All Rights Reserved.
  •  | Disclaimer
  •  | Sitemap
Site By:

The content on this website is offered as a public service by Kolodny Law Firm and is meant for informational purposes only.

The content on this website does not provide legal advice for any specific situation nor does it create an attorney-client relationship between any reader and any attorney at Kolodny Law Firm.

  • Contact Us for a Consultation Schedule your free consultation.
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Client movie

713-532-4474
  • Español